Fully autonomous weapons. Partially autonomous weapons, like those used today in Ukraine, are vital to the defense of democracy. Even fully autonomous weapons (those that take humans out of the loop entirely and automate selecting and engaging targets) may prove critical for our national defense. But today, frontier AI systems are simply not reliable enough to power fully autonomous weapons. We will not knowingly provide a product that puts America’s warfighters and civilians at risk. We have offered to work directly with the Department of War on R&D to improve the reliability of these systems, but they have not accepted this offer. In addition, without proper oversight, fully autonomous weapons cannot be relied upon to exercise the critical judgment that our highly trained, professional troops exhibit every day. They need to be deployed with proper guardrails, which don’t exist today.
（二）移动、损毁国家边境的界碑、界桩以及其他边境标志、边境设施或者领土、领海基点标志设施的；
。heLLoword翻译官方下载对此有专业解读
Варвара Кошечкина (редактор отдела оперативной информации)
But Anthropic also imposed limits that Michael views as fundamentally incompatible with war-fighting. The company’s internal “Claude Constitution” and contract terms prohibit the model’s use in, for instance, mass surveillance of Americans or fully autonomous lethal systems—even for government customers. When Michael and other officials sought to renegotiate those terms as part of a roughly $200 million defense deal, they insisted Claude be available for “all lawful purposes.” Michael framed the demand bluntly: “You can’t have an AI company sell AI to the Department of War and [not] let it do Department of War things.”